ClickBank Conspiracy

[jmartel]

Take a look at the circled orders.
notice
1- same first name and state
2- yes the last name is blurred but you can tell its the same
3- same payment method

Now, take a look at the amounts... seems like there is always one in the $x.xx range and the other in the $xx.xx range.
If a product sells for lets say 30$. Vendor takes 25% - clickbank fees ($7.xx range). Affiliate should get 75% - clickbank fees ($22.xx range)

What about the affiliates? Dont see too many aff ids there. Certainly not for the sales in question.

Finally, vendors keep saying "clickbank problems, what do you mean? sales are up for us." I wonder why.
https://legalmusicreviews.sslpowered.com/lil-wayne-gossip.com/clickbankconspiracy/clickbankconspiracy.jpg
Now to see if this thread will stay up.

[nebula1]

You stole my johns!
:lol:

http://www.beats365.com/artnew/conspiracy.jpg

P.S You owe me $90! :rant:

[jmartel]

WHAT?!? Hey Neb... you wanna stay on the topic please.

Just found another one...

https://legalmusicreviews.sslpowered.com/lil-wayne-gossip.com/cbc.jpg

google image search. keyword: clickbank screenshot

[nebula1]

First of all, since I experienced you ripping me off with Paypal a year ago, you have completely lost all credibility.

Second, The "Johns" seem to be a very rare processing problem that CB is facing, having to do with Debit card theft.
You do not have a problem whatsoever.

Third, you are completely wrong about your figures. All of your duplicates on the "johns" were refunds. That "larger non-Affiliate amount" is really a refund, which gives the figure a minus (-) symbol which makes the figure bigger. The last names are not always the same either, which points towards debit card theft. These Johns will soon be cut off. I suggest you do more research before making allegations towards vendors.

P.S: From the looks of your chart, Richard Selby had trouble purchasing the first time, purchased the second, then purchased a back end product, the same as the others. 33.90 for the front end, $45.73 for the back.

[jmartel]

Second, The "Johns" seem to be a very rare processing problem that CB is facing, having to do with Debit card theft.
You do not have a problem whatsoever.

So cards are being stolen to buy clickbank products... not just that, but the same clickbank product?


Third, you are completely wrong about your figures. All of your duplicates on the "johns" were refunds. That "larger non-Affiliate amount" is really a refund, which gives the figure a minus (-) symbol which makes the figure bigger. The last names are not always the same either, which points towards debit card theft. These Johns will soon be cut off. I suggest you do more research before making allegations towards vendors.

P.S: From the looks of your chart, Richard Selby had trouble purchasing the first time, purchased the second, then purchased a back end product, the same as the others. 33.90 for the front end, $45.73 for the back.

This makes sense. Seems like I was wrong on this one and I apologize. However, this does not remove the fact that clickbank is still fucked up.

Now please explain to me how I ripped you off. I have no idea what your talking about.

[hellal]

ewealth is probly

the most interesting forum

but thats why l like it the most

[tnt7973]

ewealth is probly

the most interesting forum

but thats why l like it the most

Brutal isn't it? LOL! :shoot:

[ArtColombia]

Not sure what the beef is about but I assume it is about false Clickbank charts.
Most people here probably know that they can be:
1. doctored
or
2. created/fabricated through self-purchases.

In any case - that still doesnt make clear what Martels point is.

However, I used his keywords and found this interestig blog,
which I though might interest/educate some who read this thread.

http://www.bizoppsblog.com/date/2006/11/