simpleone
October 29th, 2007, 06:10 PM
For those who have sent a complaint to SiteAdvisor regarding Dean, has anyone received a response back yet? If not, maybe everyone on this forum should give SiteAdvisor a bad rating as they dont seem to care about protecting publishers from false information made by reviewers. Its sad that just 1 reviewer can give a website a red X.
If a publisher has thousands of customers each month, and one hostile reviewer (who hasnt even purchased the publishers product btw) gives a bad review, how can this make a product red?
First, if they are not a customer of the product, they shouldnt be allowed to put a review.
Second, it's impossible to make every single customer happy, especially when you have thousands of customers monthly. Just one unhappy customer or non-customer, and your site gets the red X. This isn't fair and not accurate for rating a site.
Third, once you get the red ex, hostile reviewers go and check all other sites you're linked to and give them a red X along with giving the company or person a bad reputation as well. These guys havent even purchased the product. Why is this allowed?
Fourth, Its one BIG RED X Virus, because any succesful company will eventually get a hostile reviewer with a score 9/9 and rate it red for whatever reason it may be. Or a competing merchant can hire someone to do this.
Overall SiteAdvisor is going to cash in big on this and leave alot of websites in the dust on many false reviews.
People who use SiteAdvisor like the feeling of "Protection", and SiteAdvisor will allow this spam to go on for awhile until almost everysite gets reviewed.
If you check SiteAdvisor on Alexa, you'll see that alot of people are getting taken in by this.
I wander if Dean got paid on the side by a competing Affiliate Network or even SiteAdvisor to post these 33,000+ reviews? Looks very fishy.
If SiteAdvisor doesnt change, we have the power to take them down by posting a bad review about SiteAdvisor along with their past $150 million lawsuit.
I also wander if its even possible to get SiteAdvisor to turn red...it's probably rigged so that it always stays green no matter what.
Only one way to find out guys!
If a publisher has thousands of customers each month, and one hostile reviewer (who hasnt even purchased the publishers product btw) gives a bad review, how can this make a product red?
First, if they are not a customer of the product, they shouldnt be allowed to put a review.
Second, it's impossible to make every single customer happy, especially when you have thousands of customers monthly. Just one unhappy customer or non-customer, and your site gets the red X. This isn't fair and not accurate for rating a site.
Third, once you get the red ex, hostile reviewers go and check all other sites you're linked to and give them a red X along with giving the company or person a bad reputation as well. These guys havent even purchased the product. Why is this allowed?
Fourth, Its one BIG RED X Virus, because any succesful company will eventually get a hostile reviewer with a score 9/9 and rate it red for whatever reason it may be. Or a competing merchant can hire someone to do this.
Overall SiteAdvisor is going to cash in big on this and leave alot of websites in the dust on many false reviews.
People who use SiteAdvisor like the feeling of "Protection", and SiteAdvisor will allow this spam to go on for awhile until almost everysite gets reviewed.
If you check SiteAdvisor on Alexa, you'll see that alot of people are getting taken in by this.
I wander if Dean got paid on the side by a competing Affiliate Network or even SiteAdvisor to post these 33,000+ reviews? Looks very fishy.
If SiteAdvisor doesnt change, we have the power to take them down by posting a bad review about SiteAdvisor along with their past $150 million lawsuit.
I also wander if its even possible to get SiteAdvisor to turn red...it's probably rigged so that it always stays green no matter what.
Only one way to find out guys!